BrothersJudd.com
Loading

Home | Reviews | Blog | Daily | Glossary | Orrin's Stuff | Email

Listen to a bestseller for $7.49 at audible.com!
Download and Listen to any Audiobook for only $7.49. Save 50% for 3 months on over 100,000 Titles.

In an irony that neither would be likely to appreciate much, Lani Guinier's account of being nominated and then unnominated for the position of head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division is reminiscent of Robert Bork's Tempting of America (see Orrin's review).  Both quickly came to be perceived more as symbols than human beings and, as such, ended up being subjected to really unfair personal attacks and having their philosophies caricatured.  But what is really instructive about the two cases is the differences rather than the similarities.

Robert Bork's nomination split the Congress and the punditry on strictly party lines and it just so happened that the Democrats controlled the Senate at that point in time, so he went down to defeat.  However, he did get to have nomination hearings where he was questioned about his views however ineptly by  the members of the Senate Judiciary committee.  [Personally, I learned more of value about constitutional law by watching the hearings than I did in my law school class.]  Despite the fact that his nomination was clearly doomed, President Reagan stood by him and insisted on putting the matter to a vote, allowing Bork to lose honorably and granting him a sense of closure, albeit mixed with disgust, at the end of the ugly process.  Bork later wrote his book in order to explain and amplify his views on the constitution and the legal system and, to a lesser degree, to give his perspective on the nomination fight.  The result is a vital and readable contribution to our understanding of the degree to which our jurisprudence has become politicized and of the dangers it entails, as well as a resigned, but bemused, look at the Senate by someone who ran afoul of the institution.

Lani Guinier's nomination, on the other hand, split the nation along racial lines, with even traditional white allies abandoning black civil rights organizations to oppose her.  Ultimately, even Bill Clinton, her longtime friend, repudiated his own nominee and withdrew her name before she got to the hearings stage.  This, understandably, left Guinier frustrated and humiliated, feeling that she had been denied the opportunity to defend her views and her own good name.  In the most affecting passages in the book, she describes how she was about to appear on Nightline when Ted Koppel told her that the next day's New York Times and Washington Post announced that the White House had decided to pull her name, a fact of which she was unaware at the time.  She also describes having old pal Hillary walk right past her at the White House with a wave and a "Hey kiddo", obviously unwilling to stop and discuss the fiasco and she details her meeting with a dewey eyed President Clinton, who moments after telling her that the meeting was one of the most difficult of his life went before the White House press corps and denounced her as "antidemocratic".  Guinier has written another book, Tyranny of the Majority, which I honestly haven't read, but in this book she whines on ad nauseum about how the failure of her nomination was a catastrophe for the cause of civil rights in America.  In the strangest maneuver of the book, she introduces herself early on as someone who was forced to write controversial articles in order to win tenure, then laments how those views were twisted by the press and hostile politicians, then returns at the end of the book to a defense of them as her true beliefs.  The result is an enormously self-indulgent vanity piece, with insufficient consideration of, and a marked lack of honesty about, the controversial theories that ultimately sank her nomination.  The book spreads more noise than light on the issues.

The most serious flaw of the book, narrowly outweighing her egomaniacal catalogue of what appears to be every compliment that she was ever paid in her life, is the disingenuous treatment of the implications of her view of democracy.  The essential fact is that Ms Guinier does not believe that the United States Constitution, with it's system of representative democracy, adequately defends the rights of minorities.  Therefore, she proposes adoption of schemes like cumulative voting, geared towards allowing the losing minority to win actual representation regardless of their election loss.  For instance, if a school board district voted 60% Republican and 40% Democrat, they would send three Republicans and two Democrats to the board.   Now you could discuss the merits and drawbacks of these types of Rube Goldberg mechanisms until you were blue in the face, but the primary point here is that they represent a radical departure from our current constitutional regime and are a fundamental attack on representative democracy.  There is no reason that we should not consider and debate these types of measures, but intellectual honesty requires that their advocates describe them accurately.  Guinier's refusal to do so casts a shadow of deception over the book.

In the final analysis, where Judge Bork's book stands out in particular for the intellectual rigor of his arguments and analysis, Guinier's is merely interesting as a portrait of the shallowness and duplicity of her friends the Clintons.

(Reviewed:)

Grade: (D+)

  

Websites:

Book-related and General Links:
    -Lani Guinier Professor of Law (Harvard Law School)
    -ESSAY : Making Every Vote Count (Lani Guinier, December 4, 2000, The Nation)
    -ESSAY: An Equal Chance (LANI GUINIER, NY Times)
    -ESSAY: Proportional Representation is Fair for Everyone:  51% of the Vote Should Not Mean 100% of Power  (Lani Guinier, Center for Voting and Democracy)
    -ESSAY: TESTS OF POLITICAL FAIRNESS:  The Case for Cumulative Voting (Lani Guinier, Center for Voting and Democracy)
    -ESSAY: Applying Guinier's Political Fairness Tests (Robert Richie, Center for Voting and Democracy)
    -Booknotes: Lani Guinier The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy (CSPAN)
    -INTERVIEW: A "Commonplace" Conversation with Lani Guinier (Lise Funderburg, African American Review)
    -INTERVIEW: Lani Guinier (Secrets of the SAT, PBS Frontline)
    -INTERVIEW: Think Tank Transcripts:Affirmative Action and Reaction (PBS think Tank)
    -DISCUSSION: "Is the Press out of Control?": ROBERT BORK, LANI GUINIER, LARRY SABATO, SUZANNE GARMENT (PBS Think Tank)
    -Lani Guinier (Wooster.edu)
    -ARTICLE: Power Behind  the Thrown Nominee: Activist With Score to Settle (Michael Isikoff, Washington Post Staff Writer)
    -ESSAY: Lani Guinier: "Quota Queen" or Misquoted Queen? (Rob Richie and Jim Naureckas, FAIR)
    -ESSAY: Lani Guinier's Constitution (Randall Kennedy, The American Prospect)
    -ESSAY: LANI GUINIER AND PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION: The Justice Department Loses a Formidable Lawyer (Hendrik Hertzberg, Center for Voting and Democracy)
    -ESSAY: "Even My Own Mother Couldn't Recognize Me": Television News and Public Understanding (Jane Rhodes)
    -ESSAY:  From Legal Scholar to Quota Queen (Laurel Leff, Columbia Journalism Review)
    -ESSAY: Thinking About Race With a One-Track Mind (STEVEN A. HOLMES, NY Times)
    -ARTICLE: Lani Guinier, Back in New York, Fervor Intact (DAVID FIRESTONE, NY Times)
    -ESSAY: Racial Gerrymandering:   Enfranchisement or Political Apartheid (Maraleen D. Shields)
    -EXCERPT: chapter one Lift Every Voice (Denver Post)
    -REVIEW: of  LIFT EVERY VOICE Turning a Civil Rights Setback Into a New Vision of Social Justice. By Lani Guinier (Hanna Rosin, NY Times Book Review)
    -REVIEW: Anthony Lewis: The Case of Lani Guinier, NY Review of Books
        Lift Every Voice: Turning a Civil Rights Setback into a New Vision of Social Justice
            by Lani Guinier
    -RESPONSE: Abigail Thernstrom: THE LANI GUINIER CASE (NY Review of Books)
    -REVIEW: Balkanizing America   Lift Every Voice: Turning a Civil Rights Setback Into a New Vision of Social Justice  by Lani Guinier  (Chester E. Finn, Jr., Commentary)
    -BOOK REVIEW: Tale of a Failed Nomination: Lani Guinier Talks Social Justice (Paul Rosenberg, Christian Science Monitor)
    -REVIEW: of Lift Every Voice (Neil Gladstone, Philly City Paper)
    -REVIEW: of Lift Every Voice  (Michelle Dally Johnston, Denver Post Staff Writer)
    -REVIEW: of Guinier, Lani. Lift Every Voice: Turning a Civil Rights Setback into a New Vision of Social Justice (Mary Carroll, Booklist)
    -REVIEW: (Epinions)
    -REVIEW: of THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. By Lani Guinier (Alan Wolfe, NY Times Book Review)
    -REVIEW: of The Tyranny of the Majority by Lani Guinier (Mark Tushnet, Boston Review)
    -REVIEW: of The Confirmation Mess Cleaning Up the Federal Appointments Process By Stephen L. Carter  (MICHIKO KAKUTANI, NY Times)
    -REVIEW: of The Confirmation Mess Cleaning Up the Federal Appointments Process By Stephen L. Carter (Cass R. Sunstein, NY Times Book Review)
    -ESSAY: Down with Majority Rule: How our winner-take-all voting system stifles democracy (Jack Beatty, The Atlantic)
 
 

GENERAL:
    -New Democracy Forum : The Case for Proportional Representation (Robert Richie & Steven Hill, Boston Review)
    -New Democracy Forum: Rethinking Affirmative Action  (Susan Sturm and Lani Guinier, Boston Review)
    -The Center for Voting and Democracy (researches how voting systems affect participation, representation and governance. We generally advocate proportional representation systems for legislative elections, instant runoff voting for executive and judicial elections and public interest redistricting)
    Race in America    (July 13, 1998, Policy.com)
    -REVIEW: Garry Wills: Clinton's Troubles, NY Review of Books
        Leading With My Heart by Virginia Kelley with James Morgan
        The Agenda: Inside the Clinton White House by Bob Woodward
        All's Fair by Mary Matalin and James Carville with Peter Knobler
        Highwire: From the Backroads to the Beltway-The Education of Bill Clinton by John Brummett
    -REVIEW: George M. Fredrickson: America's Caste System: Will It Change?, NY Review of Books
        Liberal Racism by Jim Sleeper
        America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible
            by Stephan Thernstrom and Abigail Thernstrom
        A Country of Strangers: Blacks and Whites in America by David K. Shipler
        The Ordeal of Integration: Progress and Resentment in America's "Racial" Crisis
             by Orlando Patterson
    -REVIEW: Andrew Hacker: Grand Illusion, NY Review of Books
        One Nation, After All by Alan Wolfe
        Someone Else's House: America's Unfinished Struggle for Integration by Tamar Jacoby
        Reaching Beyond Race by Paul M. Sniderman and Edward G. Carmines
        Portrait of American Jews: The Last Half of the 20th Century by Samuel C. Heilman
        Roberts vs. Texaco: A True Story of Race and Corporate America by Bari-Ellen Roberts
    -REVIEW: Lars-Erik Nelson: Clinton & His Enemies, NY Review of Books
        Dead Center: Clinton-Gore Leadership and the Perils of Moderation by James MacGregor Burns
            and Georgia J. Sorenson
        Vote.com by Dick Morris
        Clinton's World: Remaking American Foreign Policy by William G. Hyland

Comments: